Skip to main content
By

Senate Appeals Court’s Decision Setting Aside Ndume’s Suspension

The Senate on Monday appealed against the judgement of Justice Babatunde Quadri of the Federal High Court Abuja, which set aside the suspension of Senator Mohammed Ali Ndume, from the Senate.
Justice Quadri had in a judgment he delivered on the 10 of November 2017 set aside Ndume’s suspension on the grounds that the action of the upper legislature suspending the Senator representing Borno South Senatorial District was illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional.The judge, in addition, directed the Senate and its President, to pay to the Ndume his outstanding salaries and allowances with immediate effect.
Not satisfied with the decision of the lower court, the Senate yesterday approached the Court of Appeal to unturn the judgment of the court.
Defendants in the suit who are now appellants include the Senate President; the Senate of Federal Republic of Nigeria; and Senator Samuel Anyanwu (Chairman Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions).
They anchored their appeal on six grounds and sought three reliefs from the upper court.
The appellants in the notice of appeal filed on their behalf by Mike Ozekhome (SAN), is contending among other grounds, that Justice Quadri erred in law when he held that the right to fair hearing as provided for under Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution as altered inures to the respondent against the appellants who are neither courts nor tribunals established by law.
The submitted that the lower court erred in law when it held that the respondent can join several causes of action in one suit.
It was the argument of the debate that Justice Quadri erred in law when he allowed the respondent join the application for enforcement of fundamental rights with that of reinstatement as a senator.
In grounds three, the appellants posited that the trial court erred in law when it held that the court would not interfere with the internal affairs of the legislature except where there is a breach of the fundamental rights of a citizen, the basis of which it held that the fundamental rights of the respondent were breached even when there was no evidence of such breach before the court.
They are therefore asking for an order to allow their appeal, as well as another setting aside the judgement of Justice Quadri, delivered on November 10.
The appellant is further praying the appellate court to dismiss Ndume’s suit.
However, no date has been fixed for mention.
The Senate had on March 30, 2017, suspended Ndume, for 90 legislative days for not “conducting due diligence” before filing a petition against the Senate President, Bukola Saraki and the lawmaker representing Kogi West Senatorial District, Senator Dino Melaye.
Ndume was indicted “for bringing Senator Dino Melaye, his colleague, and the institution of the Senate to unbearable disrepute.”
Consequently, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, Chairman Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, in its report to the Senate recommended that Ndume be suspended for 180 days.
Senator Ndume, not been happy with the decision had dragged the upper legislature to court challenging his suspension from the Senate.
But delivering judgment in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/551/2017, Justice Quadri however set aside the suspension for being illegal, Unlawful and unconstitutional.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sarah Sanders' absolutely unreal explanation of Trump's anti-Muslim video tweets

By
Sarah Sanders' absolutely unreal explanation of Trump's anti-Muslim video tweets Washington (CNN) On Wednesday morning,  President Donald Trump retweeted three videos purportedly showing Muslims committing acts of violence against Christians . He did so despite the fact that the videos came from a far-right, anti-Muslim group in Britain and remain unverified. Which is all beside the point, according to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders. "Whether it is a real video, the threat is real,"  Sanders told reporters Wednesday morning . "That is what the President is talking about, that is what the President is focused on is dealing with those real threats, and those are real no matter how you look at it." When pressed on the difference between the videos being real or fake, Sanders replied, "I'm not talking about the nature of the video. I think you're focusing on the wrong thing. The threat is real, and that's what the Preside...
Post a Comment
Read more
By
CHAI, Lagos Warn against Female Genital Mutilation The Child Health Advocacy Initiative (CHAI) and the Lagos State Government have warned against female genital mutilation, saying it is unhealthy and violates the rights of women. Stating this in a press briefing on FGM in Lagos, the Executive Director, CHAI, Mrs. Lola Alonge, said FGM violates all human rights principles, including equality, non discrimination of sex and the right to health. She said FGM causes lifelong physical and psychological harm, as it affects the family, community, relationships and economic development. “Trained health workers who perform FGM are violating girls and women’s right to life and health. “We therefore call for the domestication of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act (VAPP). On May 2015, President Goodluck Jonathan signed the VAPP into law. This law bans FGM and other traditional harmful practices. But the VAPP only applies at the Federal Capital Territory. It is now up to each s...
Post a Comment
Read more

State Dept. warned White House about possible increased threats after anti-Muslim tweets

By
State Dept. warned White House about possible increased threats after anti-Muslim tweets STORY HIGHLIGHTS The tweets appeared to depict Muslims engaged in different acts of violence "It didn't manifest in anything actionable, but it was a big concern," one State Department official said Washington (CNN) After President  Donald Trump retweeted anti-Muslims videos on Wednesday , multiple State Department officials said the department communicated to the White House that there was concern that protests could happen at US embassies. Officials feared that the tweets, which appeared to depict Muslims engaged in different acts of violence, would spark a reprise of the violent protests at US embassies in the Middle East which are already on high security alert. Protests erupted in September 2012 following the publication of an anti-Muslim video on the internet. Embassies were on alert throughout the day, although no incidents have been reported thus far...
Post a Comment
Read more